1 Timothy 5:17-25
Q.1. What principle was to be applied to the support of the church’s leaders? – (1 Tim.5:17-18)
Even working animals were to receive sustaining feed. How much more should God’s servants (1 Tim.5:18). Paul detailed this by drawing attention to those who ruled well, and those who worked hard at preaching and teaching – The elders who rule well are to be considered of double honour, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching (1 Tim.5:17). To do that faithfully requires personal preparation and diligent study, so that God’s people will be built up in their faith (see 1 Tim.4:16; 2 Tim.2:15). Elders and members should defer to those who have a proven record of understanding and expounding the Scriptures.
Q.2. How was discipline to be applied to the leaders of the church? – (1 Tim.5:19-21)
As we have seen at times, immense damage can be done to the testimony of Christ and His church, by the sins of leaders (see 1 Tim.5:20). Nevertheless, justice should prevail. Accusations made against those appointed to leadership had to be well founded. (1 Tim.5:19 c.f. 2 Cor.13:1). Public exposure and rebuke had to be applied without bias (see 1 Tim.5:21).
Q.3. What caution was given to those appointing elders? Why should leaders be chosen carefully? – (1 Tim.5:22-25)
Prospective leaders should be carefully scrutinized, and have a track-record of faithfulness, before appointment (see 1 Tim.5:22). While it is true that the character of these people is usually quite evident, some indications of potential problems may not be easily seen (see 1 Tim.5:24-25). Caution is therefore appropriate. Though Paul had powerfully exercised the gift of healing in his earlier ministry, this was not effective in bringing healing to Timothy’s ailment (see 1 Tim.5:23 c.f. Acts 19:11-12).